School Safety Assessment

Sample
sample_report@mettl.com
Test Taken on:
Report Version as on:
Finish State: Normal
Registration Details
Email Address: Sample_report@mettl.com
First Name: Sample
Last Name: Not filled
Date of birth: Not filled
Experience: Not filled
Country: Not filled
Social Desirability Index
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low High
Social Desirability Index: Low

The candidate has responded to the questions truthfully and hence the recommendation made on the basis of candidate's scores can be trusted.

How to Interpret the Report?
When interpreting the results, it is important to remember that the scores are not good or bad. Since the results are based on one's own view of behavior, the accuracy of the results depends upon both honesty and self-awareness while taking the test.

This assessment measures personality traits that might be manifested in behavior at the workplace. This test assesses those personality traits which are aversive and increase the propensity or chances of a person engaging in counterproductive behavior at work. To best use this report:

1. Review the overall recommendation first. 
2. While selecting the recommended candidates, focus on the traits you believe are critical for success in the role you’re hiring for, and use those scores to help you prioritize which candidates to select for the next step.
3. Remember: This assessment is just one piece of the puzzle. While hiring, it is recommended that you review other information as well – functional and job knowledge, background and past behavior (e.g. using structured behavioral interviews), reference checks, etc. in addition to the personality assessment.
4. Social desirability: We recommend low score on the social desirability scale. However, if any candidate's scores indicate high
Social Desirability, he/she needs to be considered with caution. High scores indicate that the candidate has not attempted the assessments in the desired manner.  The candidate may be considered for a re-test in such cases, if necessary.
Executive Summary
Recommendation

Recommended

Major Areas of Concern

Temperamental: Likely to display volatile temperament and exhibit physical and verbal aggression more often than others in similar situations.

Evaluation of Traits
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Opportunism: Low

Most likely to be candid in intentions towards others and is most likely to maintain high morals across situations involving students, parents and coworkers. Most likely not to believe in manipulating others or bending school rules to achieve personal benefits.

Self-obsession: Low

Most likely to have an optimal degree of self-importance. Most likely to have a normal sense of self. Least likely to feel highly entitled to the best things in life. The need for admiration from students and coworkers is low and most likely to remain balanced and work constructively even in the absence of it. Very likely to take feedback about oneself or one's work in the class or from parents and coworkers in a positive way.

Insensitivity: Low

Most likely to exhibit high concern and genuinely get affected by others' pain and distress of students, coworkers and parents. Most likely to demonstrate concern and understanding of others' feelings, thoughts and experiences by putting oneself in their frame of reference of students, parents and coworkers.

Temperamental: Moderate

Fair predisposition to become angry even with moderate provocation. Has moderate anger coping skills, therefore, sometimes engages in thinking about the situations that made one angry. Somewhat likely to get affected by memories of annoying situations from the past. Sometimes gets upset and can moderately control oneself when in angry mood while dealing with students, parents or coworkers.

Impulsiveness: Low

Has the tendency to act diligently and to consider the long-term consequences while dealing with students, coworkers and parents. Acts responsibly and always thinks before taking any actions or decisions. Most likely to be cautious and most likely to deliberate on incidents/situations and their outcomes.

Thrill-seeking: Low

Low tendency to seek stimulation through unusual and risky activities. Ver less likely to enjoy taking part in unpredictable and adventurous activities, preferring safety of self, students and coworkers over enjoyment and thrill.

Test Log