Mettl Assessment for Finance Auditor

Sample 1
sample1@mettl.com
Test Taken on:
Report Version as on:
Finish State: Normal
Registration Details
Email Address: sample1@mettl.com
First Name: sample
Last Name: Not filled
Date of birth: Not filled
Country: Not filled
Experience: Not filled
How to Interpret the Report?
When interpreting the results, it is important to remember that the scores are not good or bad, only more or less appropriate to certain types of work. Since the results are based on one's own view of behavior, the accuracy of the results depends upon both honesty and self-awareness while taking the test. 

This assessment measures work-relevant personality traits that might be manifested in work behaviour and therefore influence success on the job. To best use this report:

1. Review the overall recommendation first. Based on your need, you might want to prioritize candidates who are ‘recommended', followed by those who are ‘cautiously recommended’.
2. If you’re choosing among different candidates within the same band of recommendation, review the competencies’ results. Focus on the competencies you believe are critical for success in the role you’re hiring for, and use those scores to help you prioritize which candidates to select for the next step.
3. Remember: This assessment is just one piece of the puzzle. While hiring, it is recommended that you review other information as well – functional and job knowledge, background and past behaviour (e.g. using structured behavioural interviews), reference checks, etc. in addition to the personality assessment.
4. Use of Response Styles for Recruitment/Selection: The ideal response style is “Genuine” and it is recommended for further analysis. However, if any candidate’s response style displays Social Desirability, he/she needs to be considered with caution.
We do not recommend candidates who display Extreme Responding/Central Tendency/Careless Responding as they indicate that the candidate has not attempted the assessments in the desired manner, and that interferes with an understanding of his/her personality since it would not evoke genuine responses from the candidate's answers. This in turn is expected to interfere with the proceeding decisions, so the candidate may be considered for a re-test. Such cases are usually not considered for a statistical/detailed analysis of scores if required further.
Response Style: Genuine

Explanation of response style:

Genuine: No concerns or red flags just based on response style of candidate.

Social Desirability: If more than 75% of the questions are answered in a manner that indicates an attempt to appear in a falsely positive light or seem ‘socially desirable’.

Extreme Responding: If more than 75% of the questions are answered in a manner that indicates that an individual agrees with the statements at the lower and higher end consistently.

Central Tendency: If the middle response (‘neutral’) is selected more than 30% of the time.

Careless Responding: If more than 95% of the responses selected are from the same direction (i.e. if the candidate selected ‘most like me’ or ‘like me’ from the right-side statement or from the left-side statement alone).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation

Recommended

Strengths

Numerical Ability: Is able to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates.

Attention to Detail: Is able to capture every minute detail and present the work in a clear, complete, precise and easy to understand language.

Data Analysis: Likely to have the ability to structure and analyse observations that are obtained by different data sources and to inspect, select, transform and remodel data in order to derive a conclusion.

Areas of Development

Analytical Ability: Needs to be able to reason and provide systematic solution to a given problem. Also needs to be able to evaluate different alternatives to the problem in a step by step manner to select the best solution.

Planning and Organizing: Needs to be more organized and systematic in one’s work, by effectively planning and prioritizing tasks.

Strategic Thinking: Should make more of an effort to understand the long term implications of one's decisions and accordingly choose an appropriate course of action to accomplish organizational goals.

Evaluation of Competencies
Managing Work
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Quality Focus: High

Likely to focus one's attention on minute details of a task. May often show concern for all aspects of the job and ensure delivery of quality output. Likely to maintain accuracy and consistency across tasks in terms of the quality and set standards. Likely to be thorough and meticulous in one’s work.

Process Adherence: High

Likely to adhere to the rules and regulations placed by the organization carefully and may follow instructions and directions in order to complete the assigned tasks effectively. Likely to provide a strong and clear rationale for why certain rules and procedures must be followed and may understand the consequences of non adherence to the same. Likely to monitor compliance to established processes and procedures in order to carry out business activities legally and efficiently.

Drive for Results: High

Likely to be intrinsically motivated to complete one's tasks effectively and efficiently and may be able to work on the given task wholeheartedly. Likely to have the ability to understand the end result one is working towards. May often set challenging yet achievable goals for oneself, and may be able to display perseverance to achieve set tasks, irrespective of the circumstances.

Planning and Organizing: Moderate

Somewhat likely to be organized and systematic in one's work and may sometimes keep track of relevant resources required for efficient execution of tasks. Moderately likely to have the ability to prioritize one's work according to urgency and important of tasks, and may occasionally plan with a realistic sense of time and resources involved. May at times try to align own plans with larger organizational goals.

Strategic Thinking: Moderate

Moderately likely to demonstrate an interest in understanding the business, the market and the industry. Somewhat likely to scan the market conditions, economic environment, and competitive landscapes to make effective business decisions. May occasionally be able to understand the short and long term implications of one's actions and decisions on the organization. May at times consider challenges that are likely to arise in the future and accordingly prepare contingency plans for the same.

Managing Self
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Accountability: Moderate

Moderately likely to accept responsibility for the actions and decisions taken by oneself. Somewhat likely to take one's duties and responsibilities seriously. May at times be able to hold oneself accountable to fulfill the commitment made. May at times be able to understand one's mistakes and rectify them immediately. Moderately likely to execute one's work without seeking any guidance from others.

Ethical Propensity: Moderate

Somewhat likely to act in an ethical and trustworthy manner. May at times take a stand based on the right thing regardless of the consequence to oneself. Moderately likely to be open and transparent in one's dealings with internal and external stakeholders. Moderately likely to stick to one's professional ethics, morals, and values to complete tasks, even when it is inconvenient. May at times be able to maintain confidentiality of sensitive information related to one's organization.

Managing People
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Collaboration: High

Likely to be a good team player and may be able to maintain harmonious and cooperative relationships with team members. Likely to work collaboratively with others, with a positive approach towards achieving common goals. Likely to offer help to others without being asked to do so.

Stakeholder Management: Moderate

Moderately likely to come across as a warm and friendly person and may be somewhat interested in socializing and building relationships to develop work opportunities. May be somewhat approachable and maintain contact with immediate stakeholders on a regular basis. May at times be able to coordinate effectively with different teams and departments to ensure smooth accomplishment of common goals.

Cognitive Competency Analysis
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Numerical Ability: High

Most likely to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates. May have very high level of speed in making analysis or assessments based on given information and an excellent level of concentration in solving problems.

Data Analysis: High

Most likely to structure and analyse observations that are obtained by different data sources. May be excellent in inspection, selection, transformation and remodelling of data in order to derive a conclusion for any particular situation. May be extremely skilled in breaking down a big problem into smaller parts for better understanding of the problem, in order to solve the problem efficiently.

Abstract Reasoning: Moderate

Moderately likely to have the ability to quickly identify patterns and the logical rule underlying those patterns to arrive at solutions. May be able to gather work related information quickly, from various sources and apply it in innovative ways to solve problems. May have moderate lateral thinking abilities and fluid intelligence. May be moderately creative in thinking and in integrating data logically to arrive at solutions.

Analytical Ability: Moderate

Moderately likely to integrate issues and factors onto a conceptual framework. Somewhat likely to have the ability to reason and provide systematic solution to a given problem by breaking it down into simple cases, then evaluating different alternatives to the problem in a step by step manner. May moderately be able to analyze or perceive a given information from different perspectives. May not be very prompt in taking actions.

Attention to Detail: High

Most likely to notice everything that might be of importance, at any point of time. May be able to capture every minute detail and present the work in a clear, complete, precise and easy to understand language. May be very attentive, focused and excellent at giving desired results and in maintaining great quality.

Test Log