Report Section
Mettl Assessment for Safety Conscious Behavior
Test Taker Details
s
sample
Email Address: sample@mettl.com
How to Interpret the Report?
Response Style
Response Style Genuine
Explanation of Response Style:
Genuine
If questions are answered in a sufficiently varied manner.
Social Desirability
If questions are answered in a socially desirable manner.
Central Tendency
If many questions are answered as ‘neither agree nor disagree’.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overall Score Summary
Moderate
Strengths
Open to Learning
Likely to learn from one's experiences and mistakes and is likely to expose oneself to training and development opportunities regularly.
Attentiveness
Likely to be vigilant/attentive at one's workplace.
Cautiousness
Will be able to exercise caution when taking risks or dealing with hazardous equipments.
Areas of Development
Ability to Handle Emergencies
Needs to be proactive and confident when handling emergency situations.
Taking Responsibility
Needs to learn to take responsibility for one's actions and mistakes, and take corrective actions.
Emotional Stability
Should learn how to maintain one's calm and composure when faced with challenging tasks/situations, more often and regulate one's emotions and feelings accordingly.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Vigilance:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
1. Vigilance:
Attentiveness: High
Likely to focus on the task at hand, often able to avoid disturbances or maximizing safety. Likely to be safety conscious or put up a high amount of resilience when doing repetitive/monotonous tasks. Likely to demonstrate alertness at all the times and less likely to get bored very easily. May have the ability to identify a potential threat or break the chain of events to avoid escalation of the error. Likely to develop skills to observe and manage the same.
Cautiousness: High
Likely to avoid risky situations. Rarely seeks adventure at work and is less likely to be casual, at the cost of one's and others safety. Less likely to be carefree when dealing with dangerous equipments at work and may at times likely to follow safety procedures outlined by one's organization. Likely to demonstrate regards for one's safety and rarely executes tasks without any caution, and thinking carefully through the possible consequences of one's actions.
Rule Conscientiousness: Moderate
Moderately likely to follow instructions and directions to complete tasks assigned to oneself. Somewhat likely to adhere to the established systems and processes in one's organization, strictly. Somewhat likely to be highly ignorant about the implications of non adherence to SOPs. Somewhat likely to be aware of the imminent danger to one's life or pay attention to the same. Tends to be somewhat serious about following the safety procedures outlined by one's organization.
Ability to Handle Emergencies: Low
Not likely to anticipate hazards and prepare for the same. May not be able to effectively plan prevention techniques for potential dangers to one's safety. Not likely to have confidence in one’s own ability to handle an emergency situation, in a calm and relaxed manner. Gets highly overwhelmed when put through unseen/ambiguous situations and may not be able to use available resources to mitigate the consequences of hazards.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Self Management:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
2. Self Management:
Open to Learning: High
Likely to display a high level of curiosity to learn new things even beyond one’s own expertise. Likely to to learn from one's mistakes. Likely to effectively identify and understand one’s shortcomings and the need to up-skill. Likely to take initiatives, willingly and make significant efforts to up-skill oneself. Seeks constant feedback on one's performance. Likely to understand importance of training to adopt safer procedures or techniques of working.
Emotional Stability: Moderate
Moderately likely to remain calm, thereby experiencing high levels of anxiety, anger and hostility in times of stress. Gets overwhelmed sometimes, when unable to take control of a challenging situation. Takes impulsive decisions, at times. May be able to provide direction in crisis situations, occasionally. At times, experiences emotional upheaval and overreacts when dealing with potentially violent people or situations, causing harm to oneself and others.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pioneering Safety:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
3. Pioneering Safety:
Taking Responsibility: Low
Not likely to be responsible and active at work and may rarely ensure to follow safety procedures in one's work. Less likely to accepts when mistakes are done and take corrective actions to rectify them immediately. Less likely to take responsibility for guiding co-workers when dealing with hazardous equipments and warn them of adverse consequences in case of negligence.
