Report Section
Mettl Assessment for Safety Conscious Behavior -
Test Taker Details
S
Sample
Email Address: sample.report@mettl.com
How to Interpret the Report?
Response Style
Response Style Genuine
Explanation of Response Style:
Genuine
If questions are answered in a sufficiently varied manner.
Social Desirability
If questions are answered in a socially desirable manner.
Central Tendency
If many questions are answered as ‘neither agree nor disagree’.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation
Cautiously Recommended
Strengths
None
Areas of Development
Attentiveness
Needs to be vigilant/attentive at one's workplace.
Cautiousness
Should be able to exercise caution when taking risks or dealing with hazardous equipments.
Rule Conscientiousness
Needs to follow the safety procedures and policies set by one's organization, more often, thereby saving oneself from harm/injury.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Vigilance:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
1. Vigilance:
Attentiveness: Low
Not likely to focus on the task at hand, being unable to avoid disturbances or maximizing safety. Not likely to be safety conscious or put up a high amount of resilience when doing repetitive/monotonous tasks. Not likely to keep oneself alert at all the time and is likely to get bored very easily. May not have the ability to identify a potential threat or break the chain of events to avoid escalation of the error. Not likely to develop skills to observe and manage the same.
Cautiousness: Low
Not likely to avoid risky situations. Constantly seeks adventure at work and has a strong tendency to be casual, at the cost of one's and others safety. Likely to be highly carefree when dealing with dangerous equipments at work and less likely to follow safety procedures outlined by one's organization. Has no regard for one's safety and always executes tasks without any caution, and thinking carefully through the possible consequences of one's actions.
Rule Conscientiousness: Moderate
Moderately likely to follow instructions and directions to complete tasks assigned to oneself. Somewhat likely to adhere to the established systems and processes in one's organization, strictly. Somewhat likely to be highly ignorant about the implications of non adherence to SOPs. Somewhat likely to be aware of the imminent danger to one's life or pay attention to the same. Tends to be somewhat serious about following the safety procedures outlined by one's organization.
Ability to Handle Emergencies: Moderate
Moderately likely to anticipate hazards and prepare for the same. May at times be able to effectively plan prevention techniques for potential dangers to one's safety. Likely to be somewhat confident about one’s own ability to handle an emergency situation, in a calm and relaxed manner. Gets somewhat overwhelmed when put through unseen/ambiguous situations, and may at times be able to use available resources to mitigate the consequences of hazards.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Self Management:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
2. Self Management:
Open to Learning: Moderate
Moderately likely to display curiosity to learn new things even beyond one’s own expertise. Somewhat likely to learn from one's mistakes. Somewhat likely to identify or understand one’s shortcomings and the need to up-skill. Likely to take initiatives at times and make significant efforts to up-skill oneself. May occasionally seek and be open to feedback on one's performance. Somewhat likely to understand importance of training to adopt safer procedures or techniques of working.
Emotional Stability: Moderate
Moderately likely to remain calm, thereby experiencing high levels of anxiety, anger and hostility in times of stress. Gets overwhelmed sometimes, when unable to take control of a challenging situation. Takes impulsive decisions, at times. May be able to provide direction in crisis situations, occasionally. At times, experiences emotional upheaval and overreacts when dealing with potentially violent people or situations, causing harm to oneself and others.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pioneering Safety:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
3. Pioneering Safety:
Taking Responsibility: Moderate
Moderately likely to be responsible and active at work to ensure safety procedures in one's work. Somewhat likely to accepts when mistakes are done and take corrective actions to rectify them immediately. Somewhat likely to take responsibility for guiding co-workers when dealing with hazardous equipments and warn them of adverse consequences in case of negligence.
Test Log
Test Log
-
Started the test with Personality Inventory
-
Finished Personality Inventory and started Cognitive Ability of the test
-
Finished Cognitive Ability and started Situation based Question of the test
-
Finished the test