Report Section
Mettl Assessment for Finance Auditor
Test Taker Details
S
Sample1
Email Address: sample1@mettl.com
How to Interpret the Report?
Response Style
Response Style Genuine
Explanation of Response Style:
Genuine
No concerns or red flags just based on response style of candidate.
Social Desirability
If more than 75% of the questions are answered in a manner that indicates an attempt to appear in a falsely positive light or seem ‘socially desirable’.
Extreme Responding
If more than 75% of the questions are answered in a manner that indicates that an individual agrees with the statements at the lower and higher end consistently.
Central Tendency
If the middle response (‘neutral’) is selected more than 30% of the time.
Careless Responding
If more than 95% of the responses selected are from the same direction (i.e. if the candidate selected ‘most like me’ or ‘like me’ from the right-side statement or from the left-side statement alone).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation
Recommended
Strengths
Numerical Ability
Is able to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates.
Attention to Detail
Is able to capture every minute detail and present the work in a clear, complete, precise and easy to understand language.
Data Analysis
Likely to have the ability to structure and analyse observations that are obtained by different data sources and to inspect, select, transform and remodel data in order to derive a conclusion.
Areas of Development
Analytical Ability
Needs to be able to reason and provide systematic solution to a given problem. Also needs to be able to evaluate different alternatives to the problem in a step by step manner to select the best solution.
Planning and Organizing
Needs to be more organized and systematic in one’s work, by effectively planning and prioritizing tasks.
Strategic Thinking
Should make more of an effort to understand the long term implications of one's decisions and accordingly choose an appropriate course of action to accomplish organizational goals.
Evaluation of Competencies
Managing Work:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
1. Managing Work:
Quality Focus: High
Likely to focus one's attention on minute details of a task. May often show concern for all aspects of the job and ensure delivery of quality output. Likely to maintain accuracy and consistency across tasks in terms of the quality and set standards. Likely to be thorough and meticulous in one’s work.
Process Adherence: High
Likely to adhere to the rules and regulations placed by the organization carefully and may follow instructions and directions in order to complete the assigned tasks effectively. Likely to provide a strong and clear rationale for why certain rules and procedures must be followed and may understand the consequences of non adherence to the same. Likely to monitor compliance to established processes and procedures in order to carry out business activities legally and efficiently.
Drive for Results: High
Likely to be intrinsically motivated to complete one's tasks effectively and efficiently and may be able to work on the given task wholeheartedly. Likely to have the ability to understand the end result one is working towards. May often set challenging yet achievable goals for oneself, and may be able to display perseverance to achieve set tasks, irrespective of the circumstances.
Planning and Organizing: Moderate
Somewhat likely to be organized and systematic in one's work and may sometimes keep track of relevant resources required for efficient execution of tasks. Moderately likely to have the ability to prioritize one's work according to urgency and important of tasks, and may occasionally plan with a realistic sense of time and resources involved. May at times try to align own plans with larger organizational goals.
Strategic Thinking: Moderate
Moderately likely to demonstrate an interest in understanding the business, the market and the industry. Somewhat likely to scan the market conditions, economic environment, and competitive landscapes to make effective business decisions. May occasionally be able to understand the short and long term implications of one's actions and decisions on the organization. May at times consider challenges that are likely to arise in the future and accordingly prepare contingency plans for the same.
Evaluation of Competencies
Managing Self:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
2. Managing Self:
Accountability: Moderate
Moderately likely to accept responsibility for the actions and decisions taken by oneself. Somewhat likely to take one's duties and responsibilities seriously. May at times be able to hold oneself accountable to fulfill the commitment made. May at times be able to understand one's mistakes and rectify them immediately. Moderately likely to execute one's work without seeking any guidance from others.
Ethical Propensity: Moderate
Somewhat likely to act in an ethical and trustworthy manner. May at times take a stand based on the right thing regardless of the consequence to oneself. Moderately likely to be open and transparent in one's dealings with internal and external stakeholders. Moderately likely to stick to one's professional ethics, morals, and values to complete tasks, even when it is inconvenient. May at times be able to maintain confidentiality of sensitive information related to one's organization.
Evaluation of Competencies
Managing People:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
3. Managing People:
Collaboration: High
Likely to be a good team player and may be able to maintain harmonious and cooperative relationships with team members. Likely to work collaboratively with others, with a positive approach towards achieving common goals. Likely to offer help to others without being asked to do so.
Stakeholder Management: Moderate
Moderately likely to come across as a warm and friendly person and may be somewhat interested in socializing and building relationships to develop work opportunities. May be somewhat approachable and maintain contact with immediate stakeholders on a regular basis. May at times be able to coordinate effectively with different teams and departments to ensure smooth accomplishment of common goals.
Evaluation of Competencies
Cognitive Competency Analysis:
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
4. Cognitive Competency Analysis:
Numerical Ability: High
Most likely to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates. May have very high level of speed in making analysis or assessments based on given information and an excellent level of concentration in solving problems.
Data Analysis: High
Most likely to structure and analyse observations that are obtained by different data sources. May be excellent in inspection, selection, transformation and remodelling of data in order to derive a conclusion for any particular situation. May be extremely skilled in breaking down a big problem into smaller parts for better understanding of the problem, in order to solve the problem efficiently.
Abstract Reasoning: Moderate
Moderately likely to have the ability to quickly identify patterns and the logical rule underlying those patterns to arrive at solutions. May be able to gather work related information quickly, from various sources and apply it in innovative ways to solve problems. May have moderate lateral thinking abilities and fluid intelligence. May be moderately creative in thinking and in integrating data logically to arrive at solutions.
Analytical Ability: Moderate
Moderately likely to integrate issues and factors onto a conceptual framework. Somewhat likely to have the ability to reason and provide systematic solution to a given problem by breaking it down into simple cases, then evaluating different alternatives to the problem in a step by step manner. May moderately be able to analyze or perceive a given information from different perspectives. May not be very prompt in taking actions.
Attention to Detail: High
Most likely to notice everything that might be of importance, at any point of time. May be able to capture every minute detail and present the work in a clear, complete, precise and easy to understand language. May be very attentive, focused and excellent at giving desired results and in maintaining great quality.
