Mettl Channel Sales Executive Assessment

sample1
sample1@mettl.com
Test Taken on:
Report Version as on:
Finish State: Normal
Registration Details
Email Address: sample1@mettl.com
First Name: sample
Last Name: Not filled
Date of birth: Not filled
Country: Not filled
Experience: Not filled
How to Interpret the Report?
When interpreting the results, it is important to remember that the scores are not good or bad, only more or less appropriate to certain types of work. Since the results are based on one's own view of behavior, the accuracy of the results depends upon both honesty and self-awareness while taking the test. 

This assessment measures work-relevant personality traits that might be manifested in work behaviour and therefore influence success on the job. To best use this report:

1. Review the overall recommendation first. Based on your need, you might want to prioritize candidates who are ‘recommended', followed by those who are ‘cautiously recommended’.
2. If you’re choosing among different candidates within the same band of recommendation, review the competencies’ results. Focus on the competencies you believe are critical for success in the role you’re hiring for, and use those scores to help you prioritize which candidates to select for the next step.
3. Remember: This assessment is just one piece of the puzzle. While hiring, it is recommended that you review other information as well – functional and job knowledge, background and past behaviour (e.g. using structured behavioural interviews), reference checks, etc. in addition to the personality assessment.
4. Use of Response Styles for Recruitment/Selection: The ideal response style is “Genuine” and it is recommended for further analysis. However, if any candidate’s response style displays Social Desirability, he/she needs to be considered with caution.
We do not recommend candidates who display Extreme Responding/Central Tendency/Careless Responding as they indicate that the candidate has not attempted the assessments in the desired manner, and that interferes with an understanding of his/her personality since it would not evoke genuine responses from the candidate's answers. This in turn is expected to interfere with the proceeding decisions, so the candidate may be considered for a re-test. Such cases are usually not considered for a statistical/detailed analysis of scores if required further.
Response Style: Genuine

Explanation of response style:

Genuine: No concerns or red flags just based on response style of candidate.

Social Desirability: If more than 75% of the questions are answered in a manner that indicates an attempt to appear in a falsely positive light or seem ‘socially desirable’.

Extreme Responding: If more than 75% of the questions are answered in a manner that indicates that an individual agrees with the statements at the lower and higher end consistently.

Central Tendency: If the middle response (‘neutral’) is selected more than 30% of the time.

Careless Responding: If more than 95% of the responses selected are from the same direction (i.e. if the candidate selected ‘most like me’ or ‘like me’ from the right-side statement or from the left-side statement alone).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Recommendation Based on Overall Performance

Recommended

Strengths

Numerical Ability: Is able to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates.

Verbal Ability: Is able to use a right word at the right time and carefully formulate sentences. Is also able to communicate and express his/her thoughts effectively.

Analytical Ability: Is able to reason and provide systematic solution to a given problem. Is also able to evaluate different alternatives to the problem in a step by step manner to select the best solution.

Areas of Development

Self Confidence: Needs to be confident about one's abilities and make efforts to beat one's own performance expectations.

Following Work Procedures: Should try to adhere to the rules and regulations placed by the organization carefully and carry out tasks following the established procedures.

Accountability: Needs to learn to hold oneself accountable and accept responsibility more frequently for one's actions and decisions.

DETAILED EVALUATION OF COMPETENCIES
Personal Attributes
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Accountability: Moderate

Moderately likely to hold oneself accountable for the actions taken by oneself. May at times be able to understand one's mistakes and may occasionally rectify them immediately. Moderately likely to execute one's work without seeking any guidance from others. Moderately likely to take one's duties and responsibilities seriously and meet clients' expectations for quality, service, and professionalism. May occasionally be relied upon to complete the assigned tasks on time.

Resilience: Moderate

Moderately likely to display emotional resilience and may at times deal effectively with pressure by being calm and poised. May occasionally work efficiently and put in sufficient effort even when faced with setbacks. Somewhat likely to maintain optimal performance despite difficult situations. Moderately likely to use appropriate coping strategies to deal with workplace stress. May at times remain calm and act, especially when necessary details to carry out a task are missing.

Self Confidence: Low

Less likely to be confident about one’s own abilities. Not very likely to believe in one's ability to achieve desired objectives and may not always try beat one's own performance expectations. Less likely to compete with others to prove one's capabilities. Not very likely to come across as a sociable, confident and assertive individual.

Work Orientation
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Following Work Procedures: Low

Not very likely to adhere to the rules and regulations placed by the organization, carefully. May be somewhat unable to follow instructions or directions in order to complete the assigned tasks effectively. Not very likely to be aware of the consequences of adherence and non adherence to the organization's rules and regulations. Not very likely to carefully check work processes, in order to ensure delivery of quality output.

Planning and Organizing: Moderate

Somewhat likely to have the ability to prioritize tasks, and may at times plan with a realistic sense of time and resources. May have a slight tendency to approach every task in a structured and planned manner. Somewhat likely to establish a course of action for oneself to ensure that work is completed efficiently and on time. May at times consider the impact of one's actions and work on others and vice-versa. Somewhat likely to identify resource requirements and ensure that they are utilized in a productive and optimal manner.

Drive for Results: Moderate

Somewhat likely to be intrinsically motivated to work on given tasks wholeheartedly. Moderately likely to consistently work towards delivering desired results and may at times ensure that whatever one takes up is completed successfully. Somewhat likely to try out new strategies to accomplish challenging goals, and may at times remain focused on achieving one's targets, despite obstacles. Moderately likely to pay attention to all aspects of the job to ensure high quality output is maintained.

Interpersonal Skills
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Customer Service Orientation: High

May be able to understand and promptly deliver on customer's expectations and requirements. Likely to ensure that customer requirements are met perfectly in the first time itself. May deal with customer queries, requests and complaints in an efficient manner. Likely to focus on continuously providing excellent customer services. May come up with different ways to add value to the customer service experience.

Influence: High

Likely to be good at influencing others. Likely to provide necessary arguments to win over the other party. May often be able to convince others of one's thoughts and viewpoints by answering questions effectively. Likely to be concerned about others' perspectives and addresses them before they can bring it up themselves.

Establish Trust: High

Likely to act in an ethical and trustworthy manner. May often take a stand based on the right thing regardless of the consequence to oneself. Likely to be open and transparent in one's dealings with internal and external stakeholders. Likely to stick to one's professional ethics, morals, and values to complete tasks, even when it is inconvenient.

Networking: Moderate

Moderately likely to come across as a warm and friendly person and may be somewhat interested in socializing and building relationships to develop work opportunities. Somewhat likely to gather information and resources from internal and external sources to ensure that tasks are completed efficiently. May be somewhat approachable and maintain contact with immediate stakeholders on a regular basis.

Sales Aptitude
Values shown in above chart are sten scores
Low Moderate High
Problem Solving: High

The candidate is most likely to have the ability to quickly identify patterns and the logical rule underlying those patterns to arrive at solutions. He/she may be able to gather work related information quickly, from various sources and apply it in innovative ways to solve problems. He/she may have excellent lateral thinking abilities and fluid intelligence. He/ she may be very creative in thinking and in integrating data logically to arrive at solutions.

Numerical Ability: High

The candidate is most likely to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates. He/she may have very high level of speed in making analysis or assessments based on given information and an excellent level of concentration in solving problems.

Analytical Ability: High

The candidate is very likely to integrate issues and factors onto a conceptual framework. He/she may have strong ability to reason and provide systematic solution to a given problem by breaking it down into simple cases, then evaluating different alternatives to the problem in a step by step manner. He/she may be able to analyze or perceive a given information from different perspectives.

Verbal Ability: High

The candidate is most likely to have a good vocabulary. He/she may be excellent at proper usage of grammar and punctuation. He/she may be very good at understanding word meanings, word relationships and also in interpreting detailed information.

Test Log