EQ Test to assess emotional and social skills
EQ test assesses a person's emotional intelligence (EI) and how it can affect relations and workplaces. It aims to identify key improvement areas for personal development and focus on those strengths that one can leverage to the full potential at work.
Availability
Ready to Use
Test Type
Psychometric
Experience Level
All Levels
Difficulty Level
Moderate
Test Duration
25 minutes
Total Questions
86 Questions
Scores Reported
English
Inside This Assessment
Emotional intelligence (EI) is the ability to observe, identify, differentiate between emotions, and use this information to guide thinking and behavior. It is not an innate trait but is considered an acquired capability that one can develop to achieve outstanding performance at the workplace. Mercer| Mettl's emotional intelligence test aims to determine the level of a person's emotional intelligence and if that person can recognize, understand, manage and control emotions and reactions.
SKILL LIBRARY
This Assessment is a part of following Skills Libraries
Intelligence Competency Framework
Get a detailed look inside the test
Competency Under Scanner
Competencies:
Stress Tolerance
Demonstrating resilience in the face of challenges or adversity and being able to manage one's emotions in an effective manner.
Positive Attitude
Demonstrating an ability to stay focused and motivated to accomplish goals and display positive feelings like optimism, contentment, and joy, towards one's work.
Customize This Test
Flexible customization options to suit your needs
Set difficulty level of test
Choose easy, medium or hard questions from our skill libraries to assess candidates of different experience levels.
Combine multiple skills into one test
Add multiple skills in a single test to create an effective assessment. Assess multiple skills together.
Add your own questions to the test
Add, edit or bulk upload your own coding questions, MCQ, whiteboarding questions & more.
Request a tailor-made test
Get a tailored assessment created with the help of our subject matter experts to ensure effective screening.
The Mercer | Mettl Advantage
Our Customers Vouch for Our Quality and Service
Mercer | Mettl has been an excellent experience for our entire organization. It enabled a smoother adjustment to the digital world, and we plan to employ more of its services. We are certain we will continue using Mercer | Mettl''s online proctoring
...read more
Jasmine Calpo
Aptitude & Special Tests Unit Test Development Section
Download Case Study
The quality of the recruitment increased, because previously we were not having any assessment. The quality of assessments and the quality of reports are very well catering to our requirements. The reports are very expansive, and it gives more light
...read more
Dinesh Jagnani
Deputy Manager, Talent Management
Download Case Study
Mercer | Mettl''s solutions brought various unprecedented insights into our technical hiring process. It was complemented by reduced friction and enhanced ease and agility. With one of the most advanced and extensive lists of questions and world-cla
...read more
Shirish Awasthi
Talent Acquisition, Coforge Ltd.
Download Case Study
We had an extremely pleasant experience working with Mercer | Mettl. Thanks to Mercer | Mettl we were able to ensure contuinity in examination. I dont think we could have offered our exams any other way.
...read more
Mayank Jain
Manager, Vidyamandir Classes
Download Case Study
Mercer | Mettl was a perfect fit for our fellowship examination as the platform was streamlined with our needs seamlessly. It met the requirement of providing a secure space to the test-takers, giving us the option to use browsing tolerance. It provi
...read more
Ms. Lily Lopez-McGee
National Fellowship Director, Howard University
Download Case Study
We had short timelines in which we had to scale up our workforce. From customized solutions, ease of usability, building an in-depth understanding of the client''s problem to seamless integration with our applicant tracking system, Mercer | Mettl''s
...read more
Arpan Anand
CHRO, Aditya Infotech Limited (CP PLUS)
Download Case Study
Mercer | Mettl came across as one of the most robust platforms for AI-based proctoring. The team was accommodative, flexible and prompt. Mercer | Mettl''s team never gave ''no'' as an answer. The team was always upfront about the specifications and c
...read more
Sanjeev Phatak
Director, Centre For Management Services, AIMA
Download Case Study
Related Products
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What if a person takes a test in a socially desirable manner or manipulates or fakes the responses?
Utmost care has been taken to reduce the probability of individuals trying to present themselves in a socially desirable manner at every stage of the tool development. The following are some of the steps taken:
The item format of the assessment – the ‘semantic differential’ format – was deliberately selected for the purpose of making it hard for candidates to guess the appropriate response and ‘fake’ in order to increase their scores. The items are presented in a format that requires the individual to consciously think about their preferences and then make a choice between two equally ‘desirable’ statements.
Before beginning the assessment, the candidates are provided with information on the format of the assessment and are told to respond to the items according to their first reactions and not to overthink their responses. Guided by research showing the efficacy of ‘instructional warnings’ they are warned against faking and impression management and told that their assessment reports may be considered invalid if they distort their responses in dishonest ways.
The tool identifies certain patterns of responding and indicates in the report, if the candidate has attempted to respond to the assessment in an appropriate or a socially desirable manner.
2. Can we determine the appropriate levels of behaviors required for a specific job role in an organization?
Yes, it is possible to do so for different job roles in your organization. We follow a scientifically valid method of determining the norms appropriate for each job role. Please write to us and we would be glad to assist.
3. Candidates who apply for jobs in my organization are very unique. Will your assessment still score them appropriately?
We have undertaken every effort to include a diverse and representative sample during assessment development. Despite this, every context might attract a specific kind of applicant. Mettl does have options to optimize the assessment content and scoring for your context. Ask us about local validation and local norms and we would be glad to assist you with those steps.
4. Is it possible to map an organization's competency framework to your assessments?
Yes, it is possible. We can build a customized assessment for your organization, taking into account your organization’s unique needs and accordingly determine the combination of behaviors that determine success in your organization’s context. Please write to us for such a request and we would be glad to work out a solution for you.
5. How do we determine the thresholds for the proficiency levels for a norm group?
The thresholds for the proficiency levels are based on the normal probability distribution of scores for a particular norm group.
6. How have norms been decided for MPP?
The data obtained from the sample used during tool development have been used to determine the norms for various behaviors. Additionally, the norms are being re-calculated periodically basis new data that is collected to ensure that they stay relevant and provide the most accurate information about a candidate. However, we can further determine the norms relevant for your organization through a validation exercise. Please write to us for further details.
7. What if the reports generated for the psychometric assessments differ from the actual behavior, attitude or aptitude of the person?
Human behavior is a projection of multiple psychological and environmental factors. So, any psychometric report should not be interpreted as a definitive predictor of a particular type of behavior. These reports should be integrated with all other sources of information in reaching professional decisions about the person. If you find any discrepancy in the reports from actual behavior of the person, always refer to the other environmental, physical and psychological factors driving that behavior. For the best combination of selection tools for your needs (i.e. psychometric assessment, job/functional tests, behavioral interviews, etc.) please reach out to us and our consultants would be happy to assist you.
